šŸ§  Is Generative AI Overhyped?

PLUS: What Financial Valuations Tell Us About Mass AI Adoption

Welcome back AI prodigies!

In todayā€™s Sunday Special:

  • šŸ§ŠChatGPT Chills

  • šŸ“ŠMarkets Rip, Bubble Unlikely

  • šŸ§ØPrivate Market Woes

  • šŸ”‘Key Takeaway

Read Time: 6 minutes

šŸŽ“Key Terms

  • Federal Funds Rate: the target interest rate range the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) sets. At this rate, commercial banks borrow and lend their excess reserves to each other overnight. Lower interest rates allow companies to borrow cheaply and grow faster.

  • Forward Price-To-Earnings (P/E) Ratio: a companyā€™s stock price compared to its future profits. Higher values indicate a company may be overvalued.

  • Financial Leverage: trading or investing with borrowed money, which increases stock market volatility.

šŸ©ŗ PULSE CHECK

Is the generative AI bubble popping anytime soon?

Vote Below to View Live Results

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

šŸ§ŠCHATGPT CHILLS

OpenAIā€™s ChatGPT launched on November 30, 2022. It attracted over one million curious users within five days and 100 million signups within a few months. ChatGPTā€™s user growth has plateaued today, at least from a consumer perspective. OpenAI doesnā€™t publish up-to-date figures, but Google Search trends are a proxy for consumer interest. Google Search interest for ā€œChatGPTā€ is down 10% from its peak in April last year. Most Americans hadnā€™t heard of it then, and just 14% had submitted a query. ChatGPT was the first generative AI tool to pierce mainstream American culture and is todayā€™s second-best conversational chatbot. Its plateau may be a bellwether for the consumer generative AI space, but the product still garners tremendous interest. Below, weā€™ve provided some context:

  • ChatGPT: 1.63 billion visits and 180 million total users in February 2024.

  • Google Search: 163 billion visits and 4.9 billion total users in February 2024.

Google Search may have generated 24 more visits per signup than ChatGPT, but itā€™s the default search engine in major browsers and boasts unparalleled name recognition and vast geographic reach. Within just 16 months in consumersā€™ hands, ChatGPTā€™s usage is thoroughly impressive. Nevertheless, its plateau comes at a time when AI hype may exceed reality.

šŸ“ŠMARKETS RIP, BUBBLE UNLIKELY

Some stock market analysts question the durability of the recent AI-driven rally. In the 16 months since ChatGPTā€™s launch, the Nasdaq, an index of the largest public technology companies, is up more than 50%. Though expectations of a lower Federal Funds rate have fueled part of the rally, observers cannot ignore lofty AI expectations, as they drove the prices of the so-called Magnificent 7ā€”Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Teslaā€”up a mouth-watering 106% in 2023. Since the Nasdaqā€™s inception in 1984, such rapid appreciation has only occurred twice, and both rallies created bubbles. In 2000, speculators poured money into unprofitable internet startups. And in 2021, on post-pandemic economic recovery hopes, unprecedented money printing, and bottomless government spending, investors got ahead of themselves.

This time may be different. At the beginning of this year, the S&P 500 had a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 15.5X, excluding the Magnificent 7. In contrast, the Magnificent 7 has a forward P/E ratio of about 35X, according to Capital Group. At first glance, this seems problematic; investors are willing to pay almost double to own the stock of big technology companies rather than other large corporations. However, investors expect Magnificent 7 to produce profit growth nearly triple that of non-Magnificent 7 companies. Diving deeper, an ā€œAI bubbleā€ is likely not underway. AI-powered stocksā€™ valuations are still intact, and the current financial leverage level isnā€™t sufficient to cause concern. But in the words of Karl Marx, ā€œhistory repeats itself, first as a tragedy, second as a farce.ā€ Marxā€™s wisdom extends to capitalism. Greed isnā€™t going anywhere. And a bubble isnā€™t a bubble until it bursts. However, aside from some highly overvalued AI companies outside the Magnificent 7, like C3.AI, which ironically trades under the ticker $AI, AI has yet to create a stock market bubble.

šŸ§ØPRIVATE MARKET WOES

Corroborating the lofty expectations of public market investors, private market participants have yet to come close to realizing AI promises. In 2023, Sequoia Capital, Silicon Valleyā€™s preeminent venture capital firm, estimated that companies spent $50 billion on Nvidia hardware but only brought in $3 billion in revenue. Granted, productivity gains from generative AI should translate into revenue increases over time. As previously discussed, enterprises must overcome data storage, data availability, cybersecurity, and bureaucratic and financial obstacles before AI model implementation, which will take several years for non-software firms.

As we highlighted last week, high-profile startups are starting to fail, as Inflection AI shuttered its consumer-facing chatbot and integrated it into Microsoftā€™s enterprise-focused effort. Stability AIā€™s future is unstable after founder Emad Mostaqueā€™s downfall. In an in-depth report by Forbes, company insiders revealed its financial shortcomings. Stability AIā€™s astronomical infrastructure costs left the AI firm with just $3.81 million in reserves. According to internal company documents, Stability AI spent over $94.39 million per year to cover cloud computing costs from Amazon, Google, and GPU cloud operator CoreWeave. Once valued at a billion dollars, Stability AI is financially insolvent. Its downfall highlights the additional risk of in-house AI model development, an extraordinarily capital-intensive endeavor.

šŸ”‘KEY TAKEAWAY

Most modern revolutions endured a boom-and-bust cycle before widespread adoptionā€”PCs, the internet, and now generative AI. Tempering expectations eliminates hype. But when dollars detach from reality, bubbles inevitably build. Hopefully, the next farce wonā€™t come as quickly as the last.

šŸ“’FINAL NOTE

If you found this useful, follow us on Twitter or provide honest feedback below. It helps us improve our content.

How was todayā€™s newsletter?

ā¤ļøAI Pulse Review of The Week

ā€œIā€™m new to your newsletter. I learned about it through Stanfordā€™s SAIL club, and Iā€™m impressed.ā€

-Ryan (ā­ļøā­ļøā­ļøā­ļøā­ļøNailed it!)

šŸŽNOTION TEMPLATES

šŸšØSubscribe to our newsletter for free and receive these powerful Notion templates:

  • āš™ļø150 ChatGPT prompts for Copywriting

  • āš™ļø325 ChatGPT prompts for Email Marketing

  • šŸ“†Simple Project Management Board

  • ā±Time Tracker

Reply

or to participate.