- The AI Pulse
- Posts
- š§ Our Greatest Asset Is at Risk
š§ Our Greatest Asset Is at Risk
PLUS: The Cognitive Tradeoff No Oneās Talking About With AI

Welcome back AI prodigies!
In todayās Sunday Special:
šThe Prelude
šThe Extended Mind
š¤From Support to Substitute
šThe Shrinking Self
šKey Takeaway
Read Time: 7 minutes
šKey Terms
Cognitive Amnesia: delivering results without actively shaping the thoughts that led there.
AI Agents: virtual employees who can autonomously analyze, execute, and fulfill without you lifting a finger.
Large Language Models (LLMs): AI Models pre-trained on vast amounts of high-quality datasets to generate human-like text.
𩺠PULSE CHECK
Would you let AI automate ALL of your daily work?Vote Below to View Live Results |
šTHE PRELUDE
Imagine youāve just come home from work, exhausted after replying to emails, analyzing industry reports, and preparing for tomorrowās leadership meeting.
As you collapse onto the couch and let the silence settle, you suddenly ask yourself: āWhat did I actually think about today?ā
Not what you read, sent, or approved, but what you truly thought. An idea you explored, a sentence you crafted, a problem you solved.
You realize you canāt recall anything because you didnāt really think. Your AI Agent did most of it. What youāre experiencing is a new paradox called āCognitive Amnesia.ā
You havenāt forgotten the thoughts; youāve forgotten the experience of forming them. The machine did the thinking. You just reviewed, approved, and moved on.
The more effortless thoughts become, the easier it is to lose track of where your mind ends and the machine begins. Weāre not just automating work. Weāre automating cognition.
So, when LLMs handle the heavy cognitive lifting, do we still form genuine memories, beliefs, or ideas?
šTHE EXTENDED MIND
⦿ 1ļøā£ The Thesis.
To understand whatās happening to us, we need to first understand how our minds operate.
In 1998, British philosopher Andy Clark, along with Australian philosopher and cognitive scientist David Chalmers, proposed the Extended Mind Thesis: our minds arenāt solely confined to our brains and bodies, but can extend into the external world. So, what the heck does that mean?!
To illustrate this, they created the Inga-Otto Thought Experiment. A young woman named Inga and an Alzheimerās patient named Otto both wanted to go to The Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York City, NY.
Inga relied on her memory to recall the address, while Otto relied on his notebook to retrieve the address. Before Inga consulted her memory or Otto turned to his notebook, neither of them had MoMAās location consciously in mind, but both would say they knew where it was if asked.
Essentially, Ottoās notebook plays the same functional role as Ingaās memory; it stores and retrieves knowledge as part of his active cognition. In that sense, Ottoās mind isnāt confined to his skull. It extends onto the notebook.
⦿ 2ļøā£ The Evolution.
Weāve always extended our minds through external tools. For example, we often rely on a calculator to solve complex mathematical problems that are difficult to compute mentally. But when we use a calculator, we still need to understand the complex mathematical problem, decide which mathematical operations to perform, and interpret the results of the calculation.
But in recent decades, more advanced external tools like smartphones have led to cognitive scaffolding: integrating so seamlessly into our everyday lives that they function as an extension of our minds. For example, when we rely on Google Maps via a smartphone, we no longer construct mental maps of our surroundings. Instead, we follow instructions and directions passively, freeing up our attention for other things, like listening to a podcast or thinking about dinner plans.
Just like we tell Google Maps our desired destination, we ask LLMs for a desired output. The difference lies in the scope of automation. LLMs now handle the ideation, composition, refinement, and publishing of language. Weāre no longer just extending our minds. Now, weāre beginning to outsource thinking itself.
š¤FROM SUPPORT TO SUBSTITUTE
⦿ 3ļøā£ The Brain Before LLMs.
When we ask ChatGPT to reply to an email, we offload the responsibility of tone, phrasing, persuasion, social context, and emotional nuance.
Before LLMs, weād consider our relationship with the recipient, explore different ways to express our thoughts, and make definitive choices about tone, emphasis, and intent.
When we ask ChatGPT to summarize an industry report, we offload the burden of comprehension, analysis, and synthesis.
Before LLMs, weād sift through the industry report, identify the main arguments, gather the most compelling evidence, and craft a comprehensive overview.
Iām all for the efficiency and convenience that LLMs provide, but the effects of that efficiency and convenience are worrying. They risk dulling our critical thinking by automating the cognitive processes that shape how we understand and engage with information.
This dilemma is referred to as the Efficiency-Accountability Tradeoff, which posits that the more we rely on LLMs to streamline daily tasks, the less capable we become of performing those daily tasks ourselves.
⦿ 4ļøā£ How LLM Use Affects the Brain.
The MIT Media Lab recently published āYour Brain on ChatGPT,ā which explores the mental trade-offs of using conversational chatbots.
54 participants were assigned to three groups:
Group #1: ChatGPT Users
Group #2: Google Search Users
Group #3: Brain-Only Users
They utilized ElectroEncephaloGraphy (EEG) to record each participantās brain activity levels to assess their cognitive engagement when researching, writing, and reviewing essays.
83.3% of Group #1 couldnāt quote a single phrase from any of the essays they wrote just minutes earlier. Even scarier, 100% of Group #1 had no idea their spatial memory was weakened. For example, Group #1 experienced a decline in their ability to remember where specific sentences or certain sections were located.
Whatās even more interesting is that when participants in Group #1 were reassigned to Group #3, they exhibited reduced Alpha levels and lowered Beta waves. Alpha levels are associated with calm alertness, while Beta waves are associated with strong focus.
In other words, after previously relying on ChatGPT, the brain activity levels of these reassigned participants showed reduced levels of alertness and lowered signs of focus.
šTHE SHRINKING SELF
When we offload cognition at scale, we learn less and become less. The boundary of self (i.e., the sense of āI thought this!ā) starts to dissolve.
The more we rely on LLMs to think for us, the less we develop the capacity to think critically, reason independently, and form original judgments.
The erosion of these capacities gradually happens over time. Weāll still feel productive and produce results, but the source of those results (i.e., our own thinking) will diminish without us noticing.
This erosion leads to a sort of cognitive hollowing-out. When we donāt wrestle with language, concepts, or ambiguity ourselves, we stop forming the personal relationships to ideas that give them meaning. We lose both cognitive skills and intellectual ownership. We become vessels for information we didnāt truly absorb, echoing arguments we never constructed. The sense of āI believe this because I understand itā erodes.
Over time, the effects of this arenāt only individual but also collective. Culture evolves through thinking, debating, imagining, and grappling with profound ideas. If we let LLMs do too much of that for us, we risk becoming a civilization thatās technically powerful yet intellectually hollow.
šKEY TAKEAWAY
Our ability to think critically is crucial to making the right choices in life. It comes from the Greek word ĪĻιĻικĻĻ (i.e., Kritikos), which means āable to judge or discern.ā If you frequently rely on ChatGPT to generate ideas or summarize texts, you risk shifting from an active thinker to a passive information consumer. We must be mindful of how we integrate LLMs into our mental processes, ensuring they enhance rather than replace our critical engagement.
šFINAL NOTE
FEEDBACK
How would you rate todayās email?It helps us improve the content for you! |
ā¤ļøTAIP Review of The Week
āItās the only newsletter I actually read! It explores the good AND the bad without bias.ā
REFER & EARN
šYour Friends Learn, You Earn!
You currently have 0 referrals, only 1 away from receiving š3 Simple Steps to Turn ChatGPT Into an Instant Expert.
Share your unique referral link: https://theaipulse.beehiiv.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER